THE ARGUMENTS FOR HARMONISATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS OUTWEIGH THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17374747

Authors

  • Salimov Mirzohid Abdigofirovich International School of' finance technology and science, Lecturer, Department of Accounting Author

Keywords:

accounting standards, harmonisation, international financial reporting, comparability, transparency, IFRS, globalisation, financial reporting, investor confidence

Abstract

This article explores the ongoing debate surrounding the harmonisation of accounting standards across different countries and regions. It argues that the benefits of harmonisation—such as improved comparability, transparency, and reliability of financial statements—far outweigh the potential drawbacks. The study highlights how global alignment of accounting practices facilitates cross-border investment, enhances investor confidence, and supports the efficiency of international capital markets. Additionally, it examines the challenges related to cultural, legal, and economic differences that may hinder full harmonisation. The paper concludes that, despite existing obstacles, the pursuit of global accounting harmonisation remains a crucial step toward achieving consistency and trust in financial reporting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asian Development Bank (2021) St rengthening Financial Reporting and Audit Practices in Central Asia. Manila: ADB.

Ball, R. (2016) ‘IFRS – 10 years later’, Accounting and Business Research, 46(5), pp. 545–571.

Barth, M. (2014) ‘Measurement in financial reporting: The need for concepts’, Accounting Horizons, 28(2), pp. 331–352.

Barth, M., Landsman, W. and Lang, M. (2008) ‘International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality’, Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), pp. 467–498.

Chen, H., Tang, Q., Jiang, Y. and Lin, Z. (2010) ‘The role of IFRS in accounting quality: Evidence from the EU’, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 21(3), pp. 220–278.

Choi, F. and Meek, G. (2008) International Accounting. 7th edn. Pearson Education.

Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C. and Verdi, R. (2008) ‘Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in firm behaviour’, European Accounting Review, 17(4), pp. 1139–1170.

DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp. 147–160.

Gray, S. (1988) ‘Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally’, Abacus, 24(1), pp. 1–15.

IFRS Foundation (2023) Use of IFRS Standards around the World. London: IFRS Foundation.

Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305–360.

Ministry of Economy and Finance of Uzbekistan (2024) IFRS Implementation Roadmap 2024–2030. Tashkent: Government of Uzbekistan.

Nobes, C. (2011) International Variations in IFRS Adoption and Practice. London: ICAEW.

Nobes, C. and Parker, R. (2020) Comparative International Accounting. 14th edn. Pearson Education.

Samujh, R. and Devi, S. (2015) ‘Implementing IFRS in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities’, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 5(2), pp. 133–152.

World Bank (2022) Financial Reporting Reform in Developing Economies. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zeff, S. (2007) ‘Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence’, The British Accounting Review, 39(4), pp. 290–302.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

How to Cite

Salimov , M. (2025). THE ARGUMENTS FOR HARMONISATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS OUTWEIGH THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17374747. Journal of International Science Networks , 1(6), 20-25. https://bestjournalup.com/index.php/jisn/article/view/2227