INGLIZ VA O'ZBEK TILLARIDA SINTAKTIK USULDA HOSIL QILINGAN EVFEMIK IFODALAR

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17277494

Authors

  • Xaydarova Shoira Toxir qizi Jizzax davlat pedagogika universiteti tayanch doktoranti Author

Keywords:

evfemizm, sintaktik usul, nominalizatsiya, passiv nisbat, shart mayli, lingvistik pragmatika, qiyosiy tilshunoslik

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada o‘zbek va ingliz tillarida sintaktik usul asosida hosil qilingan evfemik ifodalarning lingvistik xususiyatlari qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Sintaktik evfemizmlar – so‘z yasalishi emas, balki gap tuzilishi, so‘z tartibi va grammatik konstruksiyalar orqali noqulay mazmunli tushunchalarni yumshatishning muhim vositasidir. Tadqiqotda ikkala tilda qo‘llaniladigan sintaktik usullar, ularning madaniy-lingvistik xususiyatlari va farqlari tahlil qilinadi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Holder, R. W. (2008). A Dictionary of Euphemisms. Oxford University Press.

Neaman, J. S., & Silver, C. G. (1990). Kind Words: A Thesaurus of Euphemisms. Facts on File.

Усмонов, С. (2018). Ўзбек тилидаги эвфемизмларнинг лингвомаданий хусусиятлари. Тил ва адабиёт таълими, 4, 45-49.

Раҳимов, М. (2020). Ўзбек ва инглиз тилларидаги эвфемизмларни қиёсий ўрганиш. Филология фанлари доктори диссертацияси. Тошкент.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-27

Conference Proceedings Volume

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Kompyuter ilmlari va muhandislik texnologiyalari. Xalqaro ilmiy-texnik anjuman 2-qism

Section

SECTION 6

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Xaydarova , S. (2025). INGLIZ VA O’ZBEK TILLARIDA SINTAKTIK USULDA HOSIL QILINGAN EVFEMIK IFODALAR: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17277494. International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1(3), 295-297. https://bestjournalup.com/index.php/ispc/article/view/2191